The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for recurrent dislocation of the left shoulder and residuals of back injury to allow for further development. The claim of service connection for tinnitus is also being remanded.
The deciding factor: Further development is needed to determine if new evidence supports reopening the previously denied claims of service connection for these conditions, as well as to address the current claim of service connection for tinnitus.
- Claimed conditions
- Recurrent dislocation of the left shoulder, Residuals of back injury
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 30, 2013
- Citation
- 1314205
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1314205.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board denied service connection for ischemic heart disease and remanded the claims for recurrent dislocation of the left shoulder, right foot disability, left foot disability, PTSD rating, and TDIU.
- Denied
The Veteran's left shoulder disability is rated at 20 percent, and the Board has determined that a higher rating is not warranted based on the evidence of record.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that a new VA examination is needed to assess the current severity of the Veteran's service-connected left and right shoulder disabilities due to increased symptoms since the last examination. The Veteran will be provided an opportunity for a supplemental statement of the case if his claims are not granted.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeals for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The rating for OSA was denied as his disability did not meet the criteria for a higher rating, while the left shoulder disability was also denied due to lack of evidence showing symptoms warranting a higher rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.