The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral shin disabilities has been reopened due to the submission of new evidence, but the issue remains undecided.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a stomach disability secondary to medication used to treat his back disability was also reopened. However, he does not have a current stomach disability.
The deciding factor: New and material evidence has been submitted in both cases, but the underlying claims remain unresolved due to lack of proof of current disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral tibia/fibula/shins, stomach
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 8, 2013
- Citation
- 1315131
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1315131.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and other conditions, rendered him unable to secure and follow substantially gainful employment prior to July 21, 2025.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for a gastrointestinal disability is being remanded due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The AOJ must obtain and consider private medical records from the Cleveland Clinic related to his gastrointestinal disorder before re-adjudicating his claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to concerns about the competency of a VA examiner who provided opinions on the relationship between the Veteran's lower jaw disability and his stomach and colon disabilities. The Veteran is requesting additional information regarding this examiner's qualifications.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including obtaining an addendum opinion from a VA medical professional regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed esophageal cancer.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.