The Veteran's right arm fracture residuals are service-connected, and the claim for hypertension has been reopened with evidence showing a relationship to service. The claims for bladder neck contracture, malnutrition residuals, and an earlier effective date for the right brachial artery aneurysm rating have also been granted.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's right arm fracture residuals were incurred during active duty and are presumed due to his status as a POW. Hypertension is service-connected based on evidence showing it was related to service, including his time as a POW. The claims for bladder neck contracture, malnutrition residuals, and an earlier effective date for the right brachial artery aneurysm rating have also been granted.
- Claimed conditions
- Right arm fracture residuals, Hypertension, Bladder neck contracture with distended bladder and transurethral resection of the prostate and bladder neck with possible carcinoma of the prostate and nephrectomy (bladder neck contracture), Malnutrition residuals
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 3, 2013
- Citation
- 1318011
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1318011.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the claim of service connection for hypertension, finding that it did not manifest during service and is not causally related to the Veteran's exposure to herbicides or service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, finding that there was no evidence of a nexus between his current condition and active duty service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied service connection for hypertension and has remanded the issue of an increased rating for skin condition.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has restored the Veteran's 10% rating for hypertension effective December 1, 2025 and denied a rating in excess of 10%. The reduction from 10% to noncompensable was not proper.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.