The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining records of any period of INACDUTRA in August 1977 and scheduling a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of the appellant's obstructive lung disease with bronchitis.
The deciding factor: The appellant contends that his obstructive lung disease with bronchitis was incurred during a period of INACDUTRA, but there is conflicting evidence regarding this. The Board has therefore remanded for further development to clarify the issue and obtain necessary medical opinions.
- Claimed conditions
- obstructive lung disease with bronchitis
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 24, 2013
- Citation
- 1320318
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1320318.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the claim for service connection for obstructive lung disease with bronchitis, finding that there was no evidence of permanent aggravation during periods of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) or inactive duty for training (INACDUTRA). The appellant's preexisting lung disability was determined to have existed prior to his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining private treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to determine if the appellant's lung disability is related to service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining a supplemental opinion from the examiner who conducted the March 2014 VA examination and provided the June 2014 addendum. The appellant's claim will be reviewed again to determine if his residuals of a lung injury are related to service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for scheduling a hearing at the St. Petersburg, Florida RO due to the appellant's request and the submission of a new VA Form 9.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.