The Veteran's appeal for higher initial ratings for migraine headache syndrome and benign essential hypertension has been dismissed due to her withdrawal of the appeal.
The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew her appeal in writing on April 25, 2013, and June 17, 2013.
- Claimed conditions
- migraine headache syndrome, benign essential hypertension
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 1, 2013
- Citation
- 1321092
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1321092.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that the Veteran meets the basic medical eligibility criteria for PCAFC benefits due to his need for personal care services based on symptoms or residuals of neurological or other impairment or injury. However, further clinical evaluation is needed to determine if participation in the program is in the Veteran's best interest.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, benign essential hypertension, and coronary arteriosclerosis due to insufficient medical opinions. The AOJ must clarify which Memorandum contains the correct findings regarding the Veteran's exposure to herbicides agents during active service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence and a duty to assist error.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for benign essential hypertension and his TDIU claim have both been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a compensable rating for hypertension, as there was no history of diastolic blood pressure predominantly 100 or more requiring continuous medication control.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.