Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome is service-connected.,Service connection for diabetes mellitus is granted due to herbicide exposure during service in Korea.,Chronic upper respiratory disorder (bronchial asthma) is not service-connected.,Depressive disorder secondary to service-connected bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome is not service-connected.,Low back disorder is not service-connected.,Intestinal disorder is not service-connected.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome was incurred in service and is presumed due to his military duties as a chemical equipment repairman.,Service connection for diabetes mellitus is granted based on herbicide exposure during service in Korea, which is presumptive under the Agent Orange Act.,Chronic upper respiratory disorder (bronchial asthma) is not service-connected because there is no evidence of such condition during service or continuity of symptomatology since service.,Depressive disorder secondary to service-connected bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome is not service-connected as it does not meet the criteria for secondary service connection.,Low back disorder is not service-connected due to lack of evidence showing a nexus between current low back symptoms and service, including National Guard service.,Intestinal disorder is not service-connected because there is no evidence of such condition during service or continuity of symptomatology since service.

Claimed conditions
bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, diabetes mellitus, chronic upper respiratory disorder (bronchial asthma), depressive disorder, low back disorder, intestinal disorder
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 2, 2013
Citation
1321263

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1321263.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.