The Veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of gallbladder removal and chronic liver disease, to include residuals of hepatitis and fatigue have been denied as there is no competent evidence that these conditions are related to his military service.
The deciding factor: There is no medical evidence showing a current disability or any link between the Veteran's in-service hepatitis and his current symptoms. The VA examiner found no known residuals/squaelae of the Veteran's in-service hepatitis, and stated that it was most likely a single episode of 'infectious jaundice' at service on 7/1968.
- Claimed conditions
- Residuals of gallbladder removal, Chronic liver disease (including residuals of hepatitis and fatigue)
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 17, 2013
- Citation
- 1322728
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1322728.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claims of service connection for bladder cancer, residuals of gallbladder removal, and skin rash. The Veteran's bladder cancer is presumed related to herbicide exposure during service. Residuals of gallbladder removal and skin rash are also presumed related to herbicide exposure. However, a VA examination is needed to determine if these conditions are etiologically related to active service.
- Granted
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has granted service connection for PTSD and Mood Disorders, both presumed conditions under the PACT Act.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
- Granted
Service connection for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is granted. The appeal as to the issue of entitlement to service connection for erectile dysfunction is dismissed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.