The Veteran's claim for service connection for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy is being remanded due to the need to rebuild his claims file and obtain additional evidence. A VA neurology examination will be conducted, and a decision on the merits of his claim will be made after all necessary development.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's exposure to herbicides during service may have predisposed him to developing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 22, 2013
- Citation
- 1323268
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1323268.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and sleep apnea to correct pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted the appeal to restore service connection for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, finding that the severance of service connection was improper.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the appeals for service connection of diabetes mellitus type II, heart disease, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy as the Veteran did not respond to a clarification request.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim for a supplemental medical opinion regarding his claimed chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, as there are inconsistencies and gaps in the evidence that need clarification.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.