Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, is service-connected.,His peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities, with foot ulcers and Charcot joint disease, is also service-connected as secondary to his diabetes mellitus, type II.,His peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities, right and left, is also service-connected as secondary to his diabetes mellitus, type II.,His peripheral vascular disease of both lower extremities is also service-connected as secondary to his diabetes mellitus, type II.,His diabetic retinopathy is not service-connected.,His sleep apnea is not service-connected.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, was diagnosed during active service and has been continuously treated since then. The neuropathy of the lower extremities with foot ulcers and Charcot joint disease is considered to be a direct result of his diabetes.,The peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities is also considered to be directly caused by his diabetes mellitus, type II.,His peripheral vascular disease in both lower extremities is also considered to be directly caused by his diabetes mellitus, type II.,There is no evidence that his diabetic retinopathy was incurred during service or as a result of his diabetes. It is not service-connected.,The Veteran's sleep apnea has not been linked to his active service and is not service-connected.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, type II, peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity, with foot ulcers and Charcot joint disease, peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity, with foot ulcers and Charcot joint disease, peripheral neuropathy, right upper extremity, peripheral neuropathy, left upper extremity, peripheral vascular disease, right lower extremity, peripheral vascular disease, left lower extremity, diabetic retinopathy, sleep apnea
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 24, 2013
Citation
1323504

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1323504.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.