The Board finds that the Veteran's November 2002 hysterectomy with residual scars is not etiologically related to symptoms, findings, or treatment in service. The Veteran's current diagnosis of residuals from a post-service hysterectomy was attributed to scar tissue around the exterior bladder flap and parametrial areas.
The deciding factor: The Board determined that there was no evidence linking the Veteran's need for a hysterectomy with her conditions treated during service (CIN III and pelvic inflammatory disease).
- Claimed conditions
- Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III, pelvic inflammatory disease
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 12, 2013
- Citation
- 1325454
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1325454.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's request for an earlier effective date for her service-connected hysterectomy, finding that the earliest possible effective date is September 24, 2018, as this was the date she filed a claim to reopen her previously denied claim.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's appeal for higher SMC ratings and a 10% rating based on multiple noncompensable service-connected disabilities is denied. The Veteran is already receiving the maximum allowable compensation for loss of use of a creative organ (female sexual arousal disorder). Her other service-connected conditions do not interfere with her employability.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's TDIU appeal is dismissed because she already has a 100% rating for PTSD, which constitutes total disability.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a gynecological condition, including cervical dysplasia, adenomyosis, endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and a hysterectomy, have been reopened. The claim of service connection for fainting vasovagal syncope is remanded due to the need for a VA examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.