The Veteran's residuals of a penetrating shell fragment wound to the right posterior chest and upper abdomen resulted in a post-dilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV-1) measurement of 80 percent predicted, a ratio of Forced Expired Volume in one second to Forced Vital Capacity (FEV-1/FVC) measurement of 78 percent, and Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide by the Single Breath Method (DLCO(SB)) of 74 percent predicted. These findings met the criteria for a 100% rating under Diagnostic Code 6843.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's post-dilator pulmonary function test results showed FEV-1/FVC and DLCO(SB) below the threshold required for a 100% rating, but his pre-dilator values were within the range that would warrant such a rating. The Board found in favor of granting a 100% rating based on post-dilator results.
- Claimed conditions
- Residuals of shell fragment wound to the right posterior chest and upper abdomen
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 12, 2013
- Citation
- 1325488
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1325488.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.