The VA medical treatment in April 2002 did not result in any new or additional bladder disability, and the Veteran's current symptoms are better explained by his prostate cancer.
The deciding factor: No objective evidence of bladder injury was found following the TURP procedure in 2002, and subsequent imaging and clinical evaluations have shown no residual issues related to the April 2002 surgery.
- Claimed conditions
- Bladder injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 26, 2013
- Citation
- 1327273
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1327273.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for the residuals of a bladder injury is granted, and his claim for TDIU is remanded due to unclear causation.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for his service-connected urinary disability, which is rated as 40 percent disabling effective November 29, 2010, has been denied. The evidence does not support a finding of more than the currently assigned 40 percent rating.
- Granted
The Veteran's postoperative complications from a June 2003 radical prostatectomy, including urinary incontinence and the need for anticoagulation therapy due to prolonged bleeding, were not reasonably foreseeable. The Board finds that these complications are service-connected.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran seeks compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for residuals of a bladder injury resulting from VA TURP surgery in April 2002. The case is remanded to obtain an opinion on whether the current chronic disability is due to carelessness, negligence or some other incident of fault on the part of VA.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.