Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Veteran has an additional disability of appendicitis, but the hepatitis A is not considered a result of the VA colonoscopy. The Board finds that there is no evidence to support a finding of causation for the hepatitis A.

The deciding factor: The March 2013 VA examination report did not provide sufficient information to determine whether the Veteran's hepatitis A was caused by the October 2004 VA colonoscopy, and the examiner opined that the appendicitis is less likely than not a result of the October 2004 procedure.

Claimed conditions
Hepatitis A, Appendicitis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
0%
Decision date
August 26, 2013
Citation
1327297

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1327297.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.