The Board has granted service connection for low back arthritis, finding that the Veteran sustained an in-service injury and has continuous symptomatology since then.
The deciding factor: The Board found credible evidence of a pre-service injury and consistent symptomatology post-service, meeting the criteria for presumptive service connection due to continuity of symptoms.
- Claimed conditions
- Low back arthritis
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 6, 2013
- Citation
- 1328577
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1328577.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's low back pain is related to his active service, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for various conditions, including TBI residuals, right and left arm disorders, right and left foot disorders, a left sciatic nerve disorder, low back arthritis, and GERD. The reasons given were that there was no evidence of these conditions during or immediately after service, and the current diagnoses did not meet the criteria for service connection.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a low back disability, finding that the Veteran's current condition did not manifest in service and is less likely than not related to his military service. Service connection was also denied for blindness.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection of a low back condition, finding that there was no evidence to support a nexus between his current arthritis and any in-service injury or event. The preponderance of the evidence did not show continuity of symptomatology since service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.