The Board has granted a 60 percent rating for the Veteran's service-connected residuals of prostate cancer, but denied his request for an increased rating. A separate 10 percent rating was assigned for the Veteran's postoperative scar from June 26, 2012.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's disability picture did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation based on voiding dysfunction or renal dysfunction.
- Claimed conditions
- prostate cancer with erectile dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 60%
- Decision date
- October 3, 2013
- Citation
- 1331877
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1331877.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's initial service connection claims for prostate cancer with erectile dysfunction and diabetes mellitus associated with herbicide exposure were denied as there is no evidence of prior claims.,The Veteran's mid-abdomen scar, hypertension, and diabetic nephropathy have all been denied.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal of a proposed reduction in the evaluation for service-connected prostate cancer with erectile dysfunction from 100 percent to non-compensable, as the August 2025 rating decision was not a final decision and did not effectuate a reduction.
- Granted
The Board granted an effective date of December 30, 2019, for service connection for prostate cancer with erectile dysfunction and special monthly compensation based on housebound criteria and loss of use of a creative organ.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's spouse, the caregiver, is found to be unable to complete caregiver training within 90 days of applying for PCAFC benefits. The claim is therefore remanded due to a lack of completion of required caregiver training.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.