The Veteran's claim for financial assistance in the purchase of an automobile and adaptive equipment or adaptive equipment is being remanded due to outstanding VA treatment records needing to be obtained, as well as a need for a new VA examination.
The deciding factor: The case was remanded because there were outstanding VA treatment records that needed to be obtained and a new VA examination was required to determine the Veteran's eligibility for financial assistance in the purchase of an automobile and adaptive equipment or adaptive equipment.
- Claimed conditions
- diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities, impotency, scar on the right thigh and upper shin, scar on the left mid upper anterior thigh
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 21, 2013
- Citation
- 1332603
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1332603.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected conditions (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diabetes mellitus, erectile dysfunction, diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities) contributed substantially or materially to his death from a fatal fall. The appeal is granted.
- Denied
The Board denied the claims for entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a muscular system disorder, impotency, incontinence, a nervous system disorder, and amnesia, as well as entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU).
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for cardiovascular disability and impotency due to potential exposure to herbicide agents during service in Korea. The case will be reviewed with additional medical evidence, including verification of exposure and a VA examination.
- Granted
The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 100% from February 27, 2017, to November 1, 2020. He also has service connection for headaches and impotence due to his PTSD.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.