The Veteran does not have an additional cardiovascular disability or chronic residuals of Legionnaires' disease that is the result of VA medical treatment at Brecksville VA Medical Center in July 2006. The Board finds no additional disability present.
The deciding factor: VA's clinical summary and opinion concluded that the Veteran's pre-existing cardiovascular condition was not aggravated by his Legionnaires' disease, which prolonged his hospital stay but did not cause permanent increase in severity of his heart condition.
- Claimed conditions
- additional cardiovascular disability, chronic residuals of Legionnaires' disease
- How they argued it
- Aggravation of a pre-existing condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 4, 2013
- Citation
- 1335332
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1335332.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran is seeking compensation benefits for additional cardiovascular disability as a result of VA treatment in January 2007. The Board has remanded the case to allow for further development and consideration.
- Remanded (sent back)
The appellant is seeking compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional cardiovascular disability due to a procedure involving attempted ablation of supraventricular tachycardia at the VAMC in Nashville, Tennessee, on October 9, 1998. The VA examiner concluded that the third-degree heart block and pacemaker placement are not a natural progression of the veteran's condition but were caused by a complication of his ablation procedure. The case is being remanded to obtain additional information from the VA General Counsel or the appropriate Regional Counsel regarding an open and pending claim against VA under the Federal Tort Claim Act.
- Denied
The evidence does not support the veteran's claim that he developed neurological disability or additional cardiovascular disability as a result of VA medical treatment in June 1998. The examiner concluded it was unlikely his current condition is related to the procedure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's right shoulder disability and migraines/chronic headaches are remanded for additional development due to insufficient opinions on the etiology of her conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.