The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral upper extremity weakness and peripheral sensory neuropathy of both lower extremities, finding that there was no medical evidence linking these conditions to his service or service-connected disabilities.,The Veteran's claim for higher ratings for peripheral sensory neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities were also denied by the Board.
The deciding factor: The VA examiners found no direct link between the Veteran's bilateral upper extremity weakness, peripheral sensory neuropathy of the lower extremities, or his service-connected elbow disabilities. The examiner opined that the arm weakness was not related to the service-connected elbow disability and did not progress despite the quiescent state of the elbows.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Upper Extremity Weakness, Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy of the Right Lower Extremity, Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy of the Left Lower Extremity
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 4, 2013
- Citation
- 1335517
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1335517.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran is granted special monthly compensation (SMC) at the level specified in 38 U.S.C. 1114(r)(1) due to service-connected bilateral upper and lower extremity weakness, which requires regular aid and attendance.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has directed an addendum medical opinion due to the August 2017 addendum opinion not identifying alternative neurological or psychiatric disorders and not analyzing whether the Veteran has any current neurological disorders other than MS. The Court also noted that the May 1984 VA neuropsychiatric examination did not support the diagnosis of MS.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.