Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has reopened the claim and found new evidence sufficient to establish that the Veteran's PTSD is due to a personal assault during her ACDUTRA period, but not related to service.

The deciding factor: The April 2012 VA psychiatric examination report provided credible alternative evidence of a stressor (a sexual assault) that occurred during the Veteran's ACDUTRA period and corroborated by other sources.

Claimed conditions
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 16, 2013
Citation
1341390

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1341390.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.