The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including scheduling a VA examination and obtaining medical records. The Veteran's claim of service connection for sexual dysfunction as secondary to his service-connected verruca acuminata on scrotum and penis should also be adjudicated.
The deciding factor: The Board found that another VA examination is necessary due to the Veteran's assertions regarding an increase in severity of his disability since the last examination, and a claim of secondary service connection for sexual dysfunction needs to be considered.
- Claimed conditions
- verruca acuminata
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 23, 2013
- Citation
- 1342404
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1342404.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's verruca acuminata on scrotum and penis was granted an initial 10 percent rating prior to September 6, 2016. From September 6, 2016 onwards, a higher rating is denied.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the veteran's appeal of his disability rating for verruca acuminata, nonvenereal and denied an increased rating for dermatophytosis, bilateral feet.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.