The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current disability for any of the claimed conditions and therefore, service connection is denied.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a finding of continuity of symptomatology from service to the present time associated with any of the claimed disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- sinus problems, status post bilateral mandible sagital osteotomy, anosmia, ageusia, dysfunction of the salivary and lacrimal glands (Sjogren's syndrome), nasal allergies
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 7, 2014
- Citation
- 1400499
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1400499.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for initial compensable ratings for anosmia and allergic rhinitis has been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating prior to October 15, 2024, or in excess of 10 percent thereafter.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's tinnitus had onset during active duty service and is granted. The claims for TBI, migraines as secondary to TBI, an eye disability as secondary to TBI, anosmia as secondary to TBI, loss of sense of taste as secondary to TBI, athlete's foot, ingrown toenails, foot pain, joint pain, low back disability, and acne are remanded due to the need for additional examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for Gulf War Syndrome is remanded due to a lack of examination and opinion regarding the relationship between his symptoms and service. The case will be reviewed again with an appropriate medical examination.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection on multiple conditions was dismissed due to the appellant not being a valid substitute and lacking standing.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.