The Veteran's right-sided neck mass, which was initially believed to be a new carotid sheath tumor, turned out to be a recurrence of his Burkitt's lymphoma. The Board finds that the treatment for this condition met the criteria for reimbursement under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1725 due to it being an emergent condition.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's right-sided neck mass was initially believed to be a new carotid sheath tumor, but subsequent testing confirmed that it was actually a recurrence of his Burkitt's lymphoma. The Board found this to be an emergent condition and granted the reimbursement request.
- Claimed conditions
- Burkitt's lymphoma, recurrent Burkitt's lymphoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 13, 2014
- Citation
- 1401550
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1401550.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for a 100% disability rating for Burkitt's lymphoma is denied.,The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities is denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for hepatitis C and Burkitt's lymphoma due to a procedural issue with the issuance of a Statement of the Case (SOC).
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for Burkitt's lymphoma and hearing loss of the right ear, finding that both conditions are related to the Veteran's military service. The decision is based on direct evidence rather than a presumption.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board cannot make a fully-informed decision on the issue of entitlement to service connection for sleep apnea, as the current VA examiner's opinion is inadequate. The Veteran contends that his sleep apnea is due or aggravated by his service-connected disabilities, but the examiner did not consider these factors in their assessment.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.