The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to determine the full extent of his stroke residuals, including any additional disabilities such as vision impairment, speech problems, pain, bladder and bowel issues, and paralysis.
The deciding factor: The Board found that a comprehensive VA examination was necessary to assess all residual effects from the July 2005 stroke.
- Claimed conditions
- vision impairment, speech problems, pain, inability to control bladder and/or bowel movements, paralysis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 17, 2014
- Citation
- 1402601
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1402601.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for an allowance for an automobile or other conveyance and adaptive equipment was denied as he is not in receipt of service-connection for the conditions that would qualify him for such benefits, and his service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for loss of use of a foot.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD has been withdrawn by the appellant.,Service connection for pain secondary to a service-connected condition is denied. The Veteran does not have a current disability of pain that is related to service or a service-connected condition he is not currently compensated for.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for vision impairment, bilateral hypertensive retinopathy, glaucoma, and pseudophakia is remanded due to the need for additional development related to toxic exposure during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate medical opinion and insufficient notice under VA regulations. The eligibility for the PCAFC program is being reviewed, with a focus on whether the Veteran requires personal care services, supervision or protection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.