The Board has determined that additional development is necessary before a decision can be rendered in this case, as the current record does not provide sufficient information to determine whether a VA or other Federal facility was feasibly available and if the Veteran was enrolled in the VA health care system at the time of the private medical treatment.
The deciding factor: The Board finds that there is insufficient evidence regarding the availability of VA facilities and the Veteran's enrollment status, necessitating further development to make these determinations.
- Claimed conditions
- alcohol-induced seizures
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 17, 2014
- Citation
- 1402602
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1402602.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.