Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for a VA examination to evaluate her bilateral pes planus after daily use, and the reduction from 50 percent to 10 percent of her rating is also under review.

The deciding factor: The March 2013 VA examination was conducted early in the morning and may not have captured the full extent of the Veteran's symptoms during their most active phase.

Claimed conditions
bilateral pes planus with left calcaneal spur
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 28, 2014
Citation
1403703

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1403703.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.