The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred for treatment of a left tibia and fibula fracture were not authorized in advance by VA, and the claim is denied as he does not meet the criteria for reimbursement under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1728.
The deciding factor: The Veteran did not have service-connected disability that would qualify him for reimbursement under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1728, and his fracture was not a medical emergency requiring immediate attention as per the criteria set forth in 38 C.F.R. § 17.1002.
- Claimed conditions
- left tibia and fibula fracture
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 25, 2014
- Citation
- 1408011
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1408011.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the VA did not comply with its prior remand directives and is therefore remanding the cases for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's left lower leg disability is currently rated at 20 percent, and the Board has remanded for a new VA examination to determine the current severity of the condition and provide an estimate of functional loss due to flare-ups.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate examination reports and inconsistencies in medical opinions. The Veteran's left lower leg disability needs a new VA examination to assess its current severity, including range of motion testing.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected conditions render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation, and thus grants his claim for TDIU.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.