The Veteran's skin condition is currently under review, and the Board has ordered additional medical examination to determine if his current symptoms are related to service. The appeal will be remanded for further development.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not address other possible etiologies for the Veteran's skin complaints, such as work-related exposure or underlying conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- pruritus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 26, 2014
- Citation
- 1408208
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1408208.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for an initial compensable rating for pruritus and service connection for nerve damage are being remanded due to duty-to-assist errors.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and rosacea prior to August 10, 2022 on a basis other than the PACT Act. Service connection is also granted for dermatitis and pruritus but denied for hidradenitis.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's dermatitis is found to be related to his active service, and the Board has granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of an adequate VA examination prior to rating the service-connected pruritus.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.