The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed neck/upper back disability, urinary/bladder disability, and increased ratings for his low back and left shoulder disabilities.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence is needed to fully assess the current severity and etiology of the Veteran's service-connected conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- neck/upper back disability, urinary/bladder disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 4, 2014
- Citation
- 1408882
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1408882.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the veteran's claims for service connection for uterine fibroids, fatigue and joint pain, urinary/bladder disability, and right knee disability due to inadequate medical examinations and opinions.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, other than PTSD with major depressive disorder is dismissed. The Board also remanded the issues of service connection for bilateral hip disability, bilateral knee disability, bilateral shoulder disability, left ankle disability, left hand disability, right elbow disability, and neck/upper back disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for neck/upper back disability and headaches due to inadequate VA medical opinions. The AOJ will obtain new opinions addressing the etiology of these conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim for a neck/upper back disability due to inadequate medical opinions and incomplete review of his records. The case is returned to the RO for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.