The Veteran's additional disability of Dupuytren's Contracture is not deemed to be a result of VA carelessness, negligence, or lack of proper skill. The Board finds that the preponderance of evidence does not support an award of compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
The deciding factor: The September 2010 VA medical examiner opined that it is less likely than not that any right or left hand/fingers disability is a result of carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on the part of the VA or by an event not reasonably foreseeable.
- Claimed conditions
- Dupuytren's Contracture
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 13, 2014
- Citation
- 1410482
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1410482.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for various conditions, including diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, all of which the Veteran claimed were due to in-service herbicide exposure. The evidence did not support a finding that the Veteran was exposed to Agent Orange or other herbicides during his active duty.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development, including obtaining medical records and providing a new VA examination to determine the etiology of his bilateral foot and hand disorders.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for Dupuytren's Contracture right (dominant) hand was denied as there is no evidence that the disability resulted from VA care or an event not reasonably foreseeable.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeal of the denial of service connection for gout and Dupuytren's Contracture before the Board could make a decision.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.