The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA genitourinary examination to assess the current severity of his prostatitis with right epididymitis. The AMC should also consider the assignment of an extra-schedular evaluation.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's claim requires further evidence and consideration due to recent allegations of worsening symptoms and additional treatment since his last VA examination more than four years ago.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic prostatitis with recurrent right epididymitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 14, 2014
- Citation
- 1410864
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1410864.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted a 70 percent rating for chronic prostatitis with recurrent right epididymitis, effective August 12, 2009, on an extraschedular basis. The Veteran's claim for TDIU is also remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient reasons and bases for the evaluation of the Veteran's service-connected prostatitis disability, specifically regarding whether an extraschedular rating is warranted.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected chronic prostatitis with recurrent right epididymitis is currently rated at 60 percent, the maximum schedular rating for voiding dysfunction. The Board finds that an evaluation in excess of 60 percent is not warranted as there is no evidence of renal dysfunction or other factors indicating an exceptional disability picture.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.