The Veteran seeks service connection for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, which he contends began during his active military service and/or was caused by exposure to Agent Orange. The Board is remanding the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine the etiology of the Veteran's claimed disorder.
The deciding factor: A VA examination is required to determine whether the Veteran's thyroid cancer is related to his in-service exposure to herbicide agents, including Agent Orange.
- Claimed conditions
- anaplastic thyroid carcinoma
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 24, 2014
- Citation
- 1412268
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1412268.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for the Veteran's cause of death, finding that diabetes did not contribute to his death and that there was no evidence linking herbicide exposure or other conditions to his thyroid cancer.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the cause of death and the contribution of service-connected diabetes mellitus. The appellant's claim for DIC under 38 U.S.C. § 1318 is also pending.
- Granted
The Veteran's anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, status post-surgical resection, is presumed to have been incurred during active service due to symptoms manifesting within a year of discharge.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.