The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the nature and etiology of any current eye disabilities, including whether they are related to service. The Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for myofascial pain dysfunction will also be remanded.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence is required to properly assess the Veteran's eye conditions and determine their relationship to his service.
- Claimed conditions
- ocular hypertension, macular edema
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 28, 2014
- Citation
- 1413200
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1413200.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II with bilateral diabetic retinopathy and macular edema did not produce incapacitating episodes during the appeal period. Therefore, a separate compensable rating for diabetic retinopathy is denied.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a back disability and an eye disability, including macular degeneration, pseudophakia, and ocular hypertension. The Board found that there was no evidence to support the Veteran's contention that his disabilities had their onset during or were related to his military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II; with diabetic retinopathy, cataracts, and macular edema; and chronic kidney disease was granted. The effective date is set at August 10, 2022, based on the effective date of the PACT Act.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's eligibility for the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is being remanded due to a lack of explanation in the April 2021 decision regarding whether participation in the program was in his best interest. The Board finds that the Veteran requires personal care services due to disabilities including posttraumatic stress disorder, tension headaches, and others.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.