The case is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and arranging for a psychiatric examination to determine the current severity of the Veteran's service-connected adjustment disorder, unspecified, and whether he is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected disability.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence is needed to fully assess the Veteran's condition and employment status related to his service-connected adjustment disorder, unspecified.
- Claimed conditions
- adjustment disorder, unspecified
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 4, 2014
- Citation
- 1414840
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1414840.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a failure to obtain an etiology opinion addressing whether the Veteran's adjustment disorder, unspecified with alcohol dependence with other alcohol-induced disorder is secondary to his back and knee disabilities. The examiner must provide opinions on this matter.
- Granted
The Veteran's psychiatric disability, adjustment disorder unspecified, is proximately caused or aggravated by his service-connected disabilities (coronary artery disease and erectile dysfunction). The Board grants service connection for this condition.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.