The Veteran's additional disability of a retinal or macular hole in the right eye, and any decrease in visual acuity, was not caused by VA care, treatment, or examination.
The deciding factor: VA did not cause the Veteran's current visual disorders due to lack of fault on their part. The formation of the retinal and/or macular holes were not foreseeable events prior to December 6, 2006. It is unlikely that any decrease in visual acuity was caused by either surgical procedure performed by VA.
- Claimed conditions
- retinal hole, macular hole
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 18, 2014
- Citation
- 1417553
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1417553.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a duty to assist error, specifically regarding the Veteran's retinal hole and astigmatism. The case will be returned for further evaluation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's initial compensable rating for lattice degeneration and a retinal hole in the left eye is denied prior to March 20, 2023. The appeal regarding service connection for right eye disability and headaches remains pending.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's hypothyroidism disability is rated at 0 percent, and the Board finds duty to assist errors occurred prior to the October 2023 rating decision. The issue of a compensable evaluation for service-connected hypothyroidism must be remanded.,The Veteran's entitlement to a 10 percent evaluation based on multiple noncompensable service-connected disabilities is also remanded due to duty to assist errors.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional medical examination and records, as well as further analysis of the Veteran's claimed left eye disorder.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.