The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development, including obtaining updated VA treatment records and scheduling a new VA examination. The issues of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 20 percent disabling for residuals of a left tibia and fibula fracture and entitlement to TDIU are now before the RO.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's claims required additional development due to inadequate prior examinations and remanded them for further consideration.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of left tibia and fibula fracture
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 28, 2014
- Citation
- 1424054
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1424054.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's residuals of left tibia and fibula fracture are currently rated at a 10% evaluation. The Board has determined that the disability is productive of moderate knee disability, warranting an increase to a 20% evaluation.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a higher evaluation for residuals of left tibia and fibula fracture is denied. The Board found that an evaluation in excess of 10 percent would violate the amputation rule as his left lower extremity has a combined rating of 60 percent, which is the maximum allowed for a knee amputation at the knee level.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.