The Board has found that there has not been substantial compliance with the mandates of a previous remand order and is therefore remanding the case for further development, including obtaining service treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to clarify any residuals from an abdominal abscess.
The deciding factor: The Board determined that the claims file did not contain all available service treatment records and that there was insufficient information regarding the Veteran's abdominal abscess condition. The Board also found that the July 2012 VA examination was inadequate, as it did not provide a clear opinion on whether the Veteran has any separate scar related to his abdominal abscess.
- Claimed conditions
- abdominal abscess, appendectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 18, 2014
- Citation
- 1427649
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1427649.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for abdominal scars was implicitly denied in the August 1994 rating decision, as her surgeries were already addressed and rated under different diagnostic codes.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of painful or tender abdominal scars associated with Crohn's disease, status-post ileocecal resection, appendectomy, and diverticulitis is dismissed as a freestanding earlier effective date claim.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of residuals of abdominal injury, finding that no valid claim was filed before March 3, 1978.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for additional disability under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to October 2017 VA medical care (panniculectomy) and secondary service connection theories.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.