The Veteran's prostate cancer was rated at 100% from November 23, 2004. The RO reduced this to noncompensable in January 2006 and then retroactively changed it to 60% effective April 1, 2006.,Between April 1, 2006 and May 3, 2006, the Veteran had residuals of prostate cancer with manifestations of a voiding dysfunction but no evidence of recurrence of active cancer or renal dysfunction. A rating in excess of 60% is not warranted for this period.,Between July 1, 2006 and May 31, 2007, the Veteran had residuals of prostate cancer with manifestations of mild stress urinary incontinence but no evidence of use of absorbent materials or renal dysfunction. A rating in excess of 30% is not warranted for this period.,Since June 1, 2007, the Veteran has awakened to void three to four times per night and had obstructed voiding, a urinary tract infection, but no evidence of use of absorbent materials or renal dysfunction. A rating in excess of 20% is not warranted for this period.
The deciding factor: The reduction from 100% to 60% was appropriate as the Veteran did not have active cancer and had no significant symptoms related to his prostate cancer.
- Claimed conditions
- Prostate Cancer with Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 60%
- Decision date
- June 19, 2014
- Citation
- 1427842
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1427842.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.