The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current liver disability and there is no evidence of any in-service injury or disease related to his liver. The Board finds that service connection for a liver disability cannot be granted as the claim fails to meet all three elements required by law: presence of a current disability, an in-service event, injury, or illness, and medical nexus between the two.
The deciding factor: The earliest clinical evidence of a liver cyst is from November 2008, approximately 17 years after separation from service. There is no competent credible evidence linking any current liver condition to active service.
- Claimed conditions
- Liver cyst, Hemangioma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 24, 2014
- Citation
- 1428430
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1428430.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a liver cyst, finding no current disability. The claim for an autoimmune disease was remanded for further evidence.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a liver cyst disability was received within one year of the date he submitted an Intent to File a claim, which is considered his effective date. The Board determined that the correct effective date for this grant of service connection is November 9, 2021.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for bladder cancer and liver cyst, finding that the evidence did not support a link to herbicide agent exposure in Vietnam.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for residuals of an excision of hemangioma at the right upper back is denied as there is no evidence of three or four painful or unstable scars.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.