The Veteran's loss of right arm function and chronic pain, as well as his syncopal episodes, are considered to be the result of a radical neck dissection performed by VA. The Board finds that these conditions were not caused by negligence or fault on the part of VA.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's additional disabilities are found to be at least as likely as not related to the March 2008 radical right neck dissection, which was a standard procedure for his condition.
- Claimed conditions
- Loss of right arm function, Chronic pain, Neurological deficits
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 25, 2014
- Citation
- 1428777
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1428777.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's appeal for increased ratings and TDIU was granted, with a 100% rating for CAD from March 3, 2023 to June 30, 2023, and a 60% rating thereafter. Separate ratings were also assigned for chest scars status post CABG.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is denied.,Compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a cervical spine disorder and chronic pain caused by his surgeries is denied due to lack of fault on the part of VA in recommending or performing the procedures.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found the eligibility decision for PCAFC to be legally inadequate and remanded for further development, including a new medical determination of the Veteran's need for personal care services and supervision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the Veteran's claim for TDIU for the period prior to August 20, 2021 for extraschedular consideration by the Director of Compensation Service. Although the Veteran did not meet schedular criteria under 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(a), evidence including a private vocational expert opinion indicated he may have been unemployable due to service-connected disabilities since at least January 1, 2014.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.