The Board has determined that service connection for varicose veins in the left lower extremity is granted, as there is credible evidence linking a reported injury during service to current varicose veins.
The deciding factor: The Board found sufficient evidence to conclude that the Veteran's injury during service is etiologically related to his current varicose veins, resolving doubt in favor of the Veteran.
- Claimed conditions
- varicose veins in the left lower extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 21, 2014
- Citation
- 1432482
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1432482.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for further development due to insufficient medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's poor circulation disabilities are related to service or secondary to her service-connected conditions.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The initial rating for varicose veins in the left lower extremity prior to December 9, 2010 was not granted as his symptoms did not meet the criteria for a higher rating. Since December 9, 2010, he is rated at 40 percent and no further increase is warranted. Service connection was denied for lumbar spine disorder, cervical spine disorder, right hand disorder, left hand disorder, nerve disorders to upper extremities, and eye disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for TDIU is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including a VA examination to assess her ability to secure and follow substantially gainful employment given her service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.