Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Board has remanded the case for a new VA medical opinion to determine if any of the conditions that caused or contributed substantially to the Veteran's death were related to his active service, including conceded in-service herbicide exposure.

The deciding factor: The VA examiner opined that it is not at least as likely as not that the cause of the Veteran's death was related to his active service. The Board finds this opinion inadequate and remands for a new one.

Claimed conditions
intracerebral hemorrhage, respiratory failure
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 7, 2014
Citation
1435302

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1435302.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.