The Board finds that the VA treatment in November 2007 did not result in additional disability, including septic arthritis and a renal condition. The Veteran's complications were due to an event not reasonably foreseeable.
The deciding factor: VA treatment on November 20-21, 2007 was appropriate given the lack of specific signs or symptoms for diagnosing septic arthritis, which led to subsequent complications.
- Claimed conditions
- septic arthritis, renal condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 8, 2014
- Citation
- 1435376
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1435376.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a renal condition, finding no evidence that it was related to his active-duty service or exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found deficiencies in a previous VA medical opinion and has ordered a remand to obtain an addendum opinion regarding the Veteran's right shoulder complications following his surgery. The Veteran contends that he suffered additional disability due to unqualified personnel administering a Cortisone injection several months after his surgery.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for endocarditis, lung cancer, diabetes mellitus, renal condition, bilateral lower extremity condition, bilateral eye condition, and osteoporosis due to unresolved medical issues and lack of a VA examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's service connection claims, including earlier effective dates for certain scars and sleep apnea. The claim for high cholesterol was denied as it is not a recognized disability for VA benefits purposes.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.