The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the Veteran's claim of service connection for inactive pulmonary tuberculosis, as the additional evidence does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.
The deciding factor: The newly submitted evidence is cumulative and does not provide sufficient information to establish service connection for the claimed condition.
- Claimed conditions
- inactive pulmonary tuberculosis
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 15, 2014
- Citation
- 1436676
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1436676.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for further development, including VA examinations to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for additional development due to non-compliance with prior remand directives, specifically obtaining all outstanding VA treatment records from the Philadelphia VAMC.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected residuals of inactive tuberculosis are currently rated at 10 percent, and the Board has determined that a higher rating is not warranted based on the evidence provided.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a compensable disability evaluation for service-connected inactive pulmonary tuberculosis and for service connection for clear cell carcinoma with renal cell carcinoma and kidney removal due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the severity of his tuberculosis throughout the period on appeal, the nature and etiology of his cancer, and whether his service-connected condition caused or aggravated his cancer.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.