The Veteran's right hip bursitis and dislocated bilateral condyles are currently rated at 10 percent each, with no further increase granted.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not demonstrate additional functional loss or limitation of motion that would warrant a higher rating under the applicable diagnostic codes.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Hip Bursitis, Dislocated Bilateral Condyles
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- August 18, 2014
- Citation
- 1436836
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1436836.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has restored the Veteran's disability ratings for right hip limitation of abduction and flexion, finding that there was a sustained improvement in his ability to function under ordinary conditions of life and work.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for TDIU was denied prior to March 17, 2017 due to his service-connected orthopedic disabilities. From March 17, 2017, the Veteran has been granted a TDIU based solely on his service-connected orthopedic disabilities.,The Veteran is now eligible for SMC at the housebound rate since November 22, 2017 due to his combined rating of 100 percent and other service-connected disabilities independently ratable at 60 percent.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for left hip osteoarthritis and right hip bursitis, finding that the current disorders were not incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Granted
The Veteran's right hip bursitis is rated at 10 percent since February 19, 2019 for limitation of extension. A separate rating for limitation of flexion was not granted as the evidence did not show functional impairment to that extent.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.