The Veteran is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) induced by medication prescribed by VA Medical Center staff in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, in 2002. The case has been remanded due to the failure to obtain an examination and provide medical opinion.
The deciding factor: The Veteran failed to report for a requested VA examination which was necessary to determine if she had current chronic disability (or additional chronic disability) caused by VA treatment that is due to an event not reasonably foreseeable, including whether VA failed to exercise the degree of care expected from a reasonable health care provider.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a cerebrovascular accident (CVA)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 21, 2014
- Citation
- 1437458
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1437458.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to inadequate opinions in the March 2024 rating decision. The Veteran's CVA is related to his service-connected hypertension, but not solely caused by it. Right and left upper extremity carpal tunnel syndrome are related to in-service lifting heavy equipment as part of his MOS. The gastrointestinal disorder other than sigmoid diverticulitis is related to in-service TERA.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for residuals of a cerebrovascular accident, genitourinary disorder, bilateral hearing loss, left eye disorder, and right eye disorder.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for a pulmonary embolism and residuals of a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) as they were not related to the Veteran's service or his service-connected hypertension.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded all issues to the VA for further examination and development of evidence.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.