The Board found that the Veteran's idiopathic cardiomyopathy did not clearly and unmistakably preexist service, nor was it incurred or aggravated during his active duty service. The evidence does not support a finding of service connection based on ACDUTRA or INACDUTRA as he had no qualifying periods in those categories at the time of his first myocardial infarction.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's cardiomyopathy did not manifest during a period of active duty, ACDUTRA, or INACDUTRA and there is no clear and unmistakable evidence that it preexisted service.
- Claimed conditions
- idiopathic cardiomyopathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 15, 2014
- Citation
- 1441168
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1441168.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal for TDIU is being remanded due to the need to obtain certain medical records from VistA and private sources. The Board will review these records to determine if they support the Veteran's claim of unemployability due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for SMC based on need for aid and attendance or being housebound is remanded due to the lack of a recent VA examination addressing his ability to care for himself.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for TDIU is remanded due to the need for additional VA and non-VA treatment records, including those from University Nursing and Rehab Center. The SSA hearing transcript must also be obtained.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the evidence is in equipoise as to whether the Veteran's cardiac disability, including idiopathic cardiomyopathy, atrial flutter, slow AV nodal re-entry, and supraventricular tachycardia, was caused by his service-connected diabetes mellitus. Therefore, service connection for this condition as secondary to diabetes mellitus is granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.