Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining private medical records from Sentara Norfolk General Hospital and providing a new VA opinion regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected PTSD caused stress that led to his death.

The deciding factor: The decision is mixed as some issues may be granted while others are denied due to the need for additional evidence and remand.

Claimed conditions
ischemic heart disease, metastatic renal cell carcinoma
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 17, 2014
Citation
1441575

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1441575.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.