The Board denied the appellant's request for an earlier effective date of June 1, 2005 for the apportionment of the Veteran's VA disability compensation benefits and also denied the discontinuation of her apportionment of the Veteran's benefits effective November 1, 2006 due to the divorce between herself and the Veteran.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the appellant was not entitled to an earlier effective date as it is governed by law rather than evidence. The discontinuance of the apportionment based on the divorce occurred prior to the Veteran's release from incarceration, making a later effective date unavailable.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 19, 2014
- Citation
- 1442011
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1442011.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.