The Veteran claims compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional disability, including infection, cranial defect, and cognitive impairment resulting from a cranioplasty on April 8, 2008 at the Kansas City VA Medical Center (VAMC). The Board finds that additional development is necessary to adequately address this claim.
The deciding factor: The July 2009 VA medical opinion did not provide sufficient information to adjudicate the claim and a supplemental medical opinion is needed to determine if there was any additional disability resulting from the April 8, 2008 cranioplasty - including infection, cognitive impairment, and/or a skull defect.
- Claimed conditions
- infection, cranial defect, cognitive impairment
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 24, 2014
- Citation
- 1442714
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1442714.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's initial 70 percent rating for panic disorder with MDD is granted, effective August 12, 2014. Additionally, the Veteran's TDIU and SMC are also granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's brain hemorrhage, including whether it is related to his service or any service-connected conditions. The case is being remanded for further examination and opinion.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for higher ratings on his adjustment disorder and cognitive impairment were dismissed due to untimely Notice of Disagreement filings.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the appeal for additional development, including new VA examinations to assess the severity of the Veteran's right knee disability and related conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.