The Board has reopened the claims for service connection for right eye disorder and left eye disorder, but denied the claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder. The case is remanded to obtain additional records from SSA and to schedule VA examinations.
The deciding factor: New evidence was submitted that relates to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claims of service connection for right eye disorder and left eye disorder, but the psychiatric claim remains denied as there is no clear and unmistakable evidence that it is related to service.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Eye Disorder, Left Eye Disorder
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 25, 2014
- Citation
- 1442986
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1442986.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's rating for left eye disorder was reduced from 20% to 0%, effective June 9, 2020. Her claim for increased rating of sarcoidosis was denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's PTSD is granted with an initial evaluation of 50 percent prior to February 20, 2020. The RO has remanded the issues regarding service connection for Skin Cancer and Left Eye Disorder due to insufficient evidence.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a disorder of the left eye, a disorder of the left hand, and manifested by left-side weakness due to lack of medical nexus between current disabilities and service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to insufficient evidence showing that his right eye disorder was caused by or aggravated by VA treatment, including the December 2015 YAG capsulotomy.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.